Shortly after the Washington Post published its article on Montgomery County's purchase of the property long believed to be the "real Uncle Tom's Cabin," the National Trust for Historic Preservation published a blog post reporting on the Washington Post story. Titled, "Preservation Round-Up: Snafu! Edition," the National Trust's post was roundly critized by Montgomery County preservationists. On November 30, 2010, two Montgomery Preservation, Inc., officers wrote a guest blog post for the National Trust for Historic Preservation titled, "Uncle Tom’s Cabin: Beyond History and Interpretation to the Internet."

Like earlier MPI comments on the Uncle Tom's Cabin issue, the blog post left much unwritten and distorts the ample documentary record on what was being said and written about the log cabin long touted as the "real Uncle Tom's Cabin." Unfortunately, the National Trust's guest bloggers omitted links to outside sources against which their comments may be measured. This brief post has embedded within it side-by-side frames with a blog post I wrote in October and the National Trust's guest blog. I invite readers to browse both and comment at my blog (below if you are reading this at the blog or at this link if your are reading this on my Website.

 

Historian for Hire blog (open original post in new window) MPI guest post on National Trust for Historic Preservation blog (open original post in new window)

And, through the miracle if iframes, here's today's blog post embedded: